Newspaper reporters are arrested when they are interviewed by seniors and are cut off from the company (Hiroyuki Fujishiro) --Apers -Yahoo! News
The "In -Company Survey Report" was announced on July 7 for the arrest of a newspaper reporter in the Hokkaido Newspaper interviewed at Asahikawa Medical University.What is written there is a terrible situation that the necessary information was not shared, and it was assaulted to the site to gain experience with seniors, and if you were interviewing with imitation, you were arrested.It is a great problem for the position of sending students to the media industry (teachers in the Department of Media Social Science).
The contents of the "internal survey report" are reported by each company, but on the Hokkaido newspaper site, you cannot read unless you become a member.Despite the fact that companies that have problems are asking for information disclosure and transparency, I do not think that such a response will be a social understanding, but I have answered that there is no problem.。
The publication method is also a problem, but the contents are more problematic.It is clear that there are many problems in the newspaper company's basic workflow, which does not seem to be understood by the Hokkaido Shimbun himself.If there is a structural problem of the organization, someone takes responsibility and provides specific improvement measures, but rather the conclusion that "continues to cover up."
In the former Asahi Shimbun, Taro Kamematsu, editor -in -chief of Danro, read "In -house survey report" and said, "What emerges from there is an individual who is sacrificed for a huge organization."He pointed out that it overlaps with the case where a new employee committed suicide.
I will look at what kind of organizational problem there is from the "In -Company Survey Report".
First of all, the premise was that the universities were in trouble on June 18, and the press was strongly protested so that they would not enter the school building, but this information was not fully shared by reporters. did.
Four reporters in the Hokkaido Shimbun were interviewed at Asahikawa Medical University on the 22nd, when arrested.Since the university has been telling the company to respond to the interview after the meeting and the interview after the meeting, the news department shares this by e -mail.However, it was not shared by a rookie reporter.The reason was that I didn't know what I was on site.
The cap instructs the rookie reporter to enter the school building and wait near the second floor.
It is useless to miss the request, but I understand that it is prohibited to enter, and make a judgment with selfish interpretation as "customary".If the other party does not share consciousness, it will not be "customary", but from the university's point of view, we protest on the 18th and send fax on the 22nd, so such "customs" are "customs".You will not know.
All of these are issues on the newspaper company, understanding the members who are moving on site, lack of information sharing, and selfish interpretation.
The rookie reporter is instructed to move from the second floor to the fourth floor, and will be recorded on a smartphone from the door of the conference room to find it by staff.At that time, it was described in the "internal survey report" that he asked his status and responded vaguely and tried to postpone.Why did the rookie reporter move, record unauthorized, respond vaguely, and return?
Here the instructions suddenly become ambiguous.If you look at the records remaining on LINE, you can see it simple, but it doesn't seem to be clear.And this is the first time a rookie reporter has interviewed Asahikawa Medical University.The reason I had such a rookie reporter assaulted in the school building was because I wanted to gain experience.
A rookie reporter who has not obtained sufficient instructions or information will be interviewed by imitating his experience from the experiences heard from some senior reporters.The reason for being asked about her status, responding vaguely, and later was the instructions from her seniors.
A rookie reporter showed a business card and armband of the Hokkaido Shimbun after a police officer rushed.The reason for removing the armband is not written in the "internal survey report".For some reason, the important thing is ambiguous.
An inexperienced rookie reporter was told that he was not able to tell the know -how of interviews, did not share information, and was falsified his status.Nevertheless, the internal investigation report will continue to describe the new reporter's responsibility.
Even though the caps are told to be sloppy, there is no way to "claim immediately".The rookie reporter is cut off at his own risk.
Masayuki Takada, a former professor at Tokyo City University in the Hokkaido Newspaper, states in the Hokkaido University of City Masayuki in the Hokkaido newspaper.
When a rookie reporter was arrested, he claimed that he had just spoke of the wall (eavesdropping from the door, etc.), "university is free.I saw a press account to claim.However, it is surprising that there are few reporter accounts criticizing the "internal survey report" that cut off a newcomer.Where did those who usually talk about journalism have disappeared?
I feel gloomy that the actions of union officials are rarely seen.Isn't the role of the union to protect workers?The fact that there is no message to a company that did not protect a newcomer reporter in the first year of joining the company has acknowledged it.Before shouting at the freedom of expression and speech, it would be meaningless if one person was protected.Isn't it a trade union to work for that?
From the "internal survey report" and the reaction, the occupation of a newspaper reporter may be cut off from the company to be arrested and belonging to a newcomer in the instructions of a senior, and cannot receive any support from the union.I understand.The lack of training is sent to the battlefield, and that it is strange that both colleagues and unions do not speak out.The newspaper company is cold, but the newspaper industry is cold, and its reality was clearly shown.You cannot send young people in the future to such places.
Newspaper reporters are an interesting job.Freedom of speech and expression is important in a democratic society.That doesn't mean that a newcomer reporter with insufficient education is arrested, and it's not a workplace where you can cut off your own responsibility for having trouble at the interview site.Before the freedom of speech, expression, and journalism, it is questioned whether it is a decent organization or industry.
I think there are young reporters who are worried on site now.It's clear that no one will help even if trouble occurs, so it's a good idea to retire and go to another industry if you are worried.And let's wait for a chance.It will not be the sacrifice of the organization.Students who are looking for a job to become a newspaper reporter should understand that they are such organizations and industries.Career centers and media teachers of universities nationwide believe that they have the role of communicating to students about such cases.
