How can computers coexist with the ecosystem (Shinchosha For Site) --Yahoo! News

The discussion between Suzuki and Morita has become even more heated.

(Continue from the first part)

Computers in the ecosystem

Morita: In the previous work "Mathematical Body", Turing is broadly divided into the first half of the leading role and Kiyoshi Oka, but "Calculation Life" corresponds to the first half of the previous work. I think it is necessary to write down the "second half" again. In that sense, the fourth chapter is like a trailer that connects in the second half, but I feel like I had a big hint to go there in today's dialogue. increase. After coming from the history of ancient Greek mathematics in Suzuki, after reaching one extreme in the ninth century, artificial intelligence and artificial life came out this time. Looking back at the history of humanity and life itself from this point again, you may see something more. What did humans do? If you go around again, you may be able to dig deeper. When it comes to "hybrid systems", the humanity that invented the calculator is back to the story that it is life. I guess it will go again in the direction of accelerating the evolution of life. It seems to me that I have repeatedly incorporated a discrete system when my life is self -duplicated and eventually complicated evolution with another layer. I still don't know what kind of life it will be. Morita: What is worrisome is an ecological relationship between a computer and a life that has existed before. Life is not only duplicated and self -preserved, but in the ecosystem, other individuals and the concept of "individual" are mixed so that they are invalid. I think that "mixing" is a two -way process, which is a relationship between the relationship between bees and flowers, or the relationship between each other, such as the relationship between the relige and the plant. How far can the side of life respond to the consequences of the calculation? What is the relationship between life and computer as the content of the calculation is becoming more and more invisible, and it becomes difficult to make a two -way relationship. Do you think? Suzuki computer is fast. Morita: That's right. Suzuki: I use it for accelerating information processing. I don't really apply a computer in a slow direction. Morita: You can't have sex with a computer that is too fast, or you can eat or eat it, how do you get more? When we think from the perspective of mixing, not just to use it as a tool, how can we get along with the computer? The phenomenon of becoming Suzuki poly cells is a major incident in the history of life evolution. Continuous organisms can now produce organs. When a single function is born in the entire body, the role is divided, and each cell has a specialized function. Neurons specialize in information transmission and processing. Specializes in filtering toxins with kidney cells. Each cell can play a different role. The major feature of multicellular organisms is that the functions are differentiated in this way, but in order to achieve this, it seems that it is essential to pass through the task of code once. In other words, in order to explode complexity, it is useless with a spatial structure alone, and in order to go up to a higher level, it has been dropped once to a very simple system, which causes complicated systems at the meta -level. It goes through the process of coming. It is an image that the level of complexity rises once by passing "discrete". However, this cake is pseudo. It contains noise from the surroundings, not the true discrete, which expands the possibility of evolution. In the history of evolution of life, what does the birth of paradigm, calculation as an artificial language, meant the evolution of life?

Page 1/2